<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DAIKH Badis</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BENOUNE Omar</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;em&gt;Comparative Study of Four Methods of Preparationof Autologous Plasma-Rich Platelet in Sheep&lt;/em&gt;</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Global Veterinaria</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2016</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.idosi.org/gv/gv.htm</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">559-563</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;b&gt;Abstract: &lt;/b&gt;The therapeutic evaluation of the biological effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the subject of&lt;br&gt;several studies in regenerative medicine. The aim of this study was to compare four different methods of&lt;br&gt;preparation of autologous platelet concentrates in sheep. Various specimens were collected from six adult&lt;br&gt;healthy male sheep of the local breed. Blood smears were also carried out on all the samples, in order to see the&lt;br&gt;morphology of the platelets. The data obtained in the manual platelet count were submitted to statistical&lt;br&gt;analysis (repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, P&amp;lt;0.05). The result was that the total mean number of&lt;br&gt;platelets in whole blood was 521.56 ± 97.01x10 /µl. The PRP samples in Groups I and III showed significantly 3&lt;br&gt;higher mean platelet counts than Group II and IV (1438.25 ± 221.72×10 /µl and 1430.75 ± 293.63×10 /µl, 3 3&lt;br&gt;respectively). In conclusion, within the limit of this study, it can be concluded that the best technique of platelet&lt;br&gt;harvesting in sheep is obtained with the double centrifugation protocol used for animals of group I.&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></issue></record></records></xml>